History of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery
The use of implants in craniomaxillofacial surgery dates back to 1950s when silastic implants were first introduced for reconstruction purposes. However, it was in 1970s that modern craniomaxillofacial surgery truly emerged with the development of new biomaterials and microvascular techniques. Titanium emerged as the preferred material for fixture implantation due to its properties like biocompatibility and strength. Nowadays, implants made of materials like polyethylene, hydroxyapatite are also commonly used.
Types of Craniomaxillofacial Implants
There are various types of implants used in Craniomaxillofacial Implants reconstruction depending on the anatomical region requiring reconstruction. Some of the major implant types include:
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implants: Used to replace the damaged TMJ in cases of trauma, arthritis or tumor resection. They help restore facial symmetry and function.
Midface Implants: Used for orbital floor and zygomatic bone reconstruction after trauma, tumor resection or congenital deformities. Implants help re-establish facial features and eye positioning.
Calvarial (skull) Implants: Used to reconstruct skull defects caused by trauma, infection or tumor resection. They prevent brain herniation and restore head shape.
Orbital Implants: Used for reconstructing orbital walls and maintaining eyeball position and motility. Various shapes like porous polyethylene, hydroxyapatite are available.
Mandibular reconstruction plates: Used to stabilize bone grafts/flaps used to reconstruction resected mandible. They provide rigidity and support for bone healing.
Biomaterials Used for Craniomaxillofacial Implants
Selecting the right material is crucial for long term implant success and durability. Some of the commonly used biomaterials include:
– Titanium and its alloys: High biocompatibility and strength make titanium the metal of choice. Commonly used in load-bearing implants.
– Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA): Autopolymerizing resin used in calvarial vault reconstruction for its easy moldability and rigidity.
– Polyethylene: Available in high and low density forms. Used for orbital and mandibular reconstruction for its malleability, biocompatibility.
– Hydroxyapatite: Synthetic calcium phosphate ceramic resembling bone mineral. Used for zygomatic, calvarial bone grafts due to its osteoconductivity.
– Silicone: Used for ear and eyeball reconstruction implants for its moldability, lightness and inertness.
Surgical Techniques used for Placement
Depending on the implant type, various open or minimally invasive surgical techniques are used for placement:
– Open approaches: Used for load-bearing implants like plates, TMJ components. Involve tissue dissection and direct visualization for accurate placement.
– Endoscopic approaches: Used for less invasive midface and orbital floor reconstruction via transoral, transantral routes. Offer morbidity and scar advantages.
– Image-guided navigation: Integration of patient’s CT scans guide precise insertion of endoscopic/miniplate implants with minimal collateral tissue damage.
Post-placement Management and Outcomes
Rigid fixation techniques, antibiotic coverage and regular follow ups help achieve implant integration and long term success. Titanium and hydroxyapatite implants show excellent osseointegration within 6-12 months. PMMA has a replacement rate of 10-15 years. Custom-made implants offer superior aesthetics and function. With advancements, craniomaxillofacial implants now provide robust and long lasting reconstructions.
Business Opportunities
The global Craniomaxillofacial Implants Report market valued around USD 1.2 billion in 2019 is projected to expand at a CAGR of 6.2% from 2020-2027. Rising demand due to increasing trauma, cancer incidence and highway accidents are major drivers. Established players like Stryker, KLS Martin, Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson with wide product portfolios currently dominate the landscape. However, opportunities exist for new entrants with customized solutions, 3D printed implants and improved biomaterials. Partnerships with medical centers provide platforms for research, training and new product launches. Favorable medical reimbursements and demand from Asian and Latin American regions indicate steady future growth prospects. With continuous technological improvements, craniomaxillofacial implants will remain a buoyant medical device sector.
Get More Insights – Craniomaxillofacial Implants
Get This Report in Japanese Language –頭蓋顎顔面インプラント マーケット
Get This Report in Korean Language –두개악안면 임플란트 시장
About Author:
Vaagisha brings over three years of expertise as a content editor in the market research domain. Originally a creative writer, she discovered her passion for editing, combining her flair for writing with a meticulous eye for detail. Her ability to craft and refine compelling content makes her an invaluable asset in delivering polished and engaging write-ups.
(LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaagisha-singh-8080b91)